sure no stress. When it will be with a too large volume we will complain.
Ideally I would like DataFrame not to be part of PolyMath but of Containers
and that PolyMath uses Containers.
What is Containers: a Collection of datastructure that is managed in a
modular fashion.
I would like to remove from the image all the datastructure that are not used
and migrate them to Containers + tests + coverage + consistent documentation.
So that we can cherry pick the one we need.

http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~StephaneDucasse/Containers/source

Stef



Stef

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:39 AM, Alistair Grant <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 09:28:13AM +0200, Serge Stinckwich wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Alistair Grant <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Everyone,
>>
>> ?Hi Alistair,
>>
>>     I've started using DataFrame, it's great to have this functionality
>>     easily available, and noticed a few issues with the inspector:
>>
>>     1. The inspector always shows row numbers and not the supplied name.
>>
>>     2. The last column label isn't displayed.
>>
>>
>>     Where should I report issues?
>>     https://github.com/PolyMathOrg/DataFrame/issues
>>
>>
>>
>> ?Thank you for your report.?
>>
>> ?At the moment, you can report issues here. I guess later, we will intregrate
>> DataFrame in the main PolyMath repository.
>> ?
>>
>>     I have a patch that addresses the first issue, although I'm not
>>     completely happy with it, and I'll take a look at the second issue.
>>
>>
>> ?This is maybe better to discuss about DataFrame? and other PolyMath issues
>> on the polymath mailing-list: 
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/scismalltalk
>>
>> ?See you there !?
>
> Hi Serge,
>
> Thanks, I've joined the group and reposted the message there.
>
> I wrote:
>>     If I remember correctly, there has been some discussion about making the
>>     column widths draggable in the inspector.  I would prefer to have a
>>     context menu that is "size to fit".  This could be potentially expensive
>>     to calculate, so it would be user-initiated.
>
> I think this is more of a FastTable / GT issue than DataFrame, so maybe
> the discussion should stay here?  (if anyone is interested :-)).
>
> Thanks,
> Alistair
>

Reply via email to