Hi Offray, That’s a lot to process for me, I need some time to inspect your workflow to find the possible connections with the ILE. I will do that in the next few days and give you more detailed feedback.
As for the Linux testers, I will gladly come back to you. I think it won’t be too hard to make the ILE support Linux and Windows. The platform dependency is only induced by the way an OS allows one to register custom URI schemes. Cheers, Manuel > On 2 Nov 2017, at 18:03, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas > <offray.l...@mutabit.com> wrote: > > Hi Manuel, > > This is really interesting! I like the idea of a graph and the way ILE > manages metadata importation. Grafoscopio [1][2][3], is the software I'm > creating for reproducible research and literate computing (mixing prose, > code, queries, data and visualizations). It has alpha support for Zotero and > I think that ILE and Grafoscopio could work together to provide researcher > support for creating and working with research literature. > > [1] http://mutabit.com/grafoscopio/index.en.html > <http://mutabit.com/grafoscopio/index.en.html> > [2] http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/alvicoda/doc/tip/index.html > <http://mutabit.com/repos.fossil/alvicoda/doc/tip/index.html> > [3] http://joss.theoj.org/papers/c92ed13fa746bc681081f9b31678841b > <http://joss.theoj.org/papers/c92ed13fa746bc681081f9b31678841b> > Now my research workflow includes Pharo, TeXStudio, Grafoscopio, Zotero, > Docear[4] and Hypothesis[5] to map and annotate research literature, but > there is a lot of context switching, as you point in your presentation, and > lack of moldability that we could get rid of, if those tools were integrated > into Pharo. To manage this, I usually have two screens (see screenshot below) > where I made annotated reading (in hypothesis) and map readings (in Docear). > That is because Docear is not integrated (yet) with Hypothesis, which has a > superb annotation system. > > [4] http://www.docear.org/ <http://www.docear.org/> > [5] https://web.hypothes.is/ <https://web.hypothes.is/> > I would like to have a similar tree like Docear reading interface , connected > with the annotated reading of hypothesis (tags and comments), inside > Pharo/Grafoscopio. In my ideal workflow I would add a bibliography item to > Zotero (using add item by ID or dropping the URL/PDF), open it (getting the > table of contents map inside Pharo, ala Docear and thanks to Hypothesis) and > I would start to annotate and tag my readings. After that, some DSL would > allow me to recover, visualize and export such annotations to be put inside > of or connected with a Grafoscopio notebook and there I would finish the > research writing. > What do you think of this workflow? Could ILE support or be part of it in > some way? > > Once you have packaged ILE, I could help as a tester in Gnu/Linux. > Cheers, > > Offray > <oghneepgbajdbnif.png> > > On 01/11/17 16:16, Manuel Leuenberger wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I was experimenting in the last few weeks with my take on literature >> research. For me, the corpus of scientific papers form an interconnected >> graph, not those plain lists and tables we keep in our bibliographies. So, >> here is the first prototype that has Google Scholar integration for search, >> can fetch PDFs from IEEE and ACM, extracts metadata from PDFs - all this >> results in hyperlinked PDFs! >> >> See a demo here: https://youtu.be/EcK3Pt_WnEw <https://youtu.be/EcK3Pt_WnEw> >> Also slides from the SCG seminar here: >> http://scg.unibe.ch/download/softwarecomposition/2017-10-31-Leuenberger-ILE.pdf >> >> <http://scg.unibe.ch/download/softwarecomposition/2017-10-31-Leuenberger-ILE.pdf> >> >> I plan on packaging it, so that those who are interested can check it out >> themselves (help wanted!). Currently, it only works on macOS. >> >> What do you think of my approach? Which use cases should be added? >> >> Cheers, >> Manuel >> >
