On 30/12/17 11:49, Stephane Ducasse wrote: > May be in pandoc community people helps each others. Sorry I could not resist.
Yes. In that community they help each other. I was asking in *this* community about Markdown support on two specific issues *inside Pharo*. Some answers are coming on that front, after the classical deviation on why everybody should use Pillar for documentation, if wants to be part of this community. > > I want a system that we can maintain and debug. This is why we are > removing make and bash scripts from pillar. > Because this is not nice to fight with ugly generated bash files, believe me. > > stef > I believe you. I found much more easier to use Pandoc + Grafoscopio that Pillar + Grafoscopio, because of all those external dependencies. And I say this after reading the documentation of both and using one extensively not because of my prejudice against or in favor of a particular markup. I want also a system that I can debug and maintain and also play well with others. I think that having a more versatile playground is better, not worse, including supporting several syntax and markup languages. It seems not something against having such maintainable systems, but in favor of it. Cheers, Offray
