On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:02 AM, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote:
> thx for looking into this. half way there ;) > do you have the Pharo build numbers that match these Nautilus versions? > I don't. PharoLauncher didn't work for me, when I try to launch an image I get an exception "MessageNotUnderstood: MacProcess>>waitForCommand:". So I just downloaded images from get.pharo.org and then used Monticello to identify the Nautilus packages versions and bisected in a 6.0 image until I found the version that introduced the bug. Do you need the build numbers? I suppose I can get the builds from https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/ ? cheers, Siemen > > cheers -ben > > On 9 March 2018 at 14:30, Siemen Baader <siemenbaa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The regression happens between Nautilus-TheIntegrator1352.mcz and >> Nautilus-TheIntegrator1351.mcz. Pharo 6.0 uses >> Nautilus-TheIntegrator1366.mcz >> >> I'll look more to find the actual code that breaks. >> >> -- Siemen >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Siemen Baader <siemenbaa...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Stef, >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Stephane Ducasse < >>> stepharo.s...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Siemen >>>> >>>> I use often cmd-L too and may be we got a regression. >>>> >>> >>> I'm pretty sure I started doing it after I saw you do it in the MOOC ;) >>> >>> And indeed I have the same behavior in Pharo 70. >>>> Can you try to see how to address it? >>>> >>> >>> Yes, I can try to look into it. I don't have any clear idea where to >>> start other than browsing Nautilus code and perhaps uses of >>> NautilusChanged, but perhaps it is not that hard to find. >>> >>> -- Siemen >>> >>>> >>>> Stef >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:37 PM, Siemen Baader <siemenbaa...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Hi all, >>>> > >>>> > I downloaded Pharo 6.1 for OSX and whenever I revert changes in >>>> Nautilus >>>> > with CMD-L, the content is reverted and the orange dirty marker >>>> triangle >>>> > disappears. But when I switch to a different method, Nautilus shows >>>> the >>>> > 'Content has been modified. What do you want to do?' dialog, as it >>>> only >>>> > should when content is actually different. >>>> > >>>> > I use this all the time, I can't imagine I'm the only one, but I >>>> couldn't >>>> > find the problem mentioned anywhere. Does anyone else have it? What >>>> to do? >>>> > >>>> > -- Siemen >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
