Thinking about this more - why doesn’t Calypso appear in iceberg as a separate project alongside iceberg and Pharo?
That’s what’s confusing? And how did it get loaded from it’s git project without it appearing? Which all makes me think there might need to be an iceberg setting - show/hide system projects so they don’t get in the way of your own projects. But then if you accidentally save a method in a system class - how are we going to spit it and know? I hate getting burned when you thought you were on a roll Tim Sent from my iPhone > On 20 Jun 2018, at 02:26, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote: > > Hi - so in trying to improve the sendersof/implementors of - I thought I had > nailed it (and got working what I had done in Pharo 6 for Pharo 7) - but when > I loaded my commit into a fresh image I realised that none of the (minor) > changes I had made to Calypso had been committed. > > This is actually quite confusing - and its take me a while to realise that > Calypso is a separate project and so when I picked commit on Pharo - this > won’t pick up any of the changes in Calypso…. Arrrgggg > > So now I’m guessing that I have to follow the same steps that I followed for > loading a pharo repo - for Calypso? > > But then if I do this - and I propose some fixes to Calypso - how can it > work, as it relies on some changes to older pharo core editors that its > inserting from? > > My changes without Calypso will work (they did in V6) - but then how can > someone test those in V7 as Calypso is then the default variable. > > I’m in a bit of a twist - how can I proceed? > > I’d really like to help improve the situation - as its bugged me for years > that its a pain looking stuff up quickly (requiring you to highlight just the > right stuff for very obvious things) > > Tim
