Ok. Thanks. Cheers, Doru
> On Oct 23, 2018, at 3:30 PM, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.kriva...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > the Ring 2 is not integrated because we do not want to have two version in > the system at once and we are not ready for the old Ring removal. However, it > is marked as deprecated to warn people that they probably should not base > their new code on it. > > That is important for more intensive usage of the models. Most people want to > simply have something like a method reference. In that case, you can still > use the old Ring. We will add some class comments to clarify that. > > Cheers, > -- Pavel > > út 23. 10. 2018 v 14:41 odesílatel Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> napsal: > Hi, > > Ok. > > So, as Ring2 is not in Pharo 7 and all Ring classes in Pharo 7 are > deprecated, should we still use them, or is it desired to load Ring2 in our > applications? > > Cheers, > Doru > > > > On Oct 23, 2018, at 9:01 AM, Peter Uhnak <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Doru, > > > > I imagine the replacement is Pavel's Ring2 > > https://github.com/pavel-krivanek/ring2 > > > > Peter > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:56 PM Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Ring seems to be deprecated in Pharo 7. Is there something else it will be > > replaced with? > > > > In particular, I am looking for the correct class that should correspond to > > RGMethodDefinition. > > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > > > > > -- > > www.feenk.com > > > > "Value is always contextual." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > www.feenk.com > > "In a world where everything is moving ever faster, > one might have better chances to win by moving slower." > > > > > > -- www.feenk.com "Beauty is where we see it."
