Hi Steffen,

Have you considered to yield (an) proxy object(s) instead of the actual > Singleton in uniqueInstance? This way it suffices to update the proxy
> with each update of the code.
I am not sure I understand what you are proposing. My problem is figuring out how to change in-memory objects when they become obsolete after a code change. So I'd say it doesn't matter much if the object I need to change is the singleton or a proxy to it, but maybe I am missing something!

Cheers,
  Konrad.

Reply via email to