Hi Sabine - you raise an important point, and I am interested in us getting better answers to this too. Hopefully Dale see’s this and is thinking about this in Rowen. Repeatable loading is an important enterprise feature.
Tim > On 18 Feb 2019, at 15:46, Sabine Manaa <manaa.sab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For test and deployment, I have to be sure that I know exactly which versions > I load and I have to be sure to be able to load exactly the same code again. > I do not speak from my projects but from the projects I use. > > I found myself asking people again and again to set tags in their projects > and being surprised again and again by changed code even though I am trying > to load versions (with versions I mean NOT #stable or #master but like > v2.2.2). > > The reason for this problem I then have, is that often in baselines with > version numbers (e.g. v2.2.2) other projects are referenced but as master. > So in consequence, I load version but get master from another project which > is referenced indirectly. > > For me, that this is not good at all. I was wondering that this seems not to > be a problem for others. > > I found out that I can put a lock in my baselines preLoadDoIt for those > indirectly referenced projects. > > Examlpe Artefact v1.0.1 > > https://github.com/pharo-contributions/Artefact/blob/v1.0.1/src/BaselineOfArtefact/BaselineOfArtefact.class.st > > loads github://zweidenker/Units/src (which is master). > > I found a solution for this: > > In the preLoadDoIt of my baseline I lock Units to a certain commit. > > preLoadDoIt > Metacello new > baseline: 'Units'; > repository: 'github://zweidenker/Units:98d5a3d/src'; > lock. > > This solves my problem in this example. > > Disadvantage is that I have to analyze everything which is loaded from the > projects I use and create a lock for it. > > Questions: > 1.) Wouldn't it make sense to have some mechanism, perhaps in Rowan then, > where I can say that a project which has a number can only reference other > projects with numbers? This would avoid the whole problem > 2.) How do others solve this problem? > > addendum: I do not speak about project versions which are in development, > here #stable or master are great features. But sometime when a project has a > certain state, and it gets a version, then it should not change..imho > > > > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html >