I was just explaining how it is now, what I think the rationale is behind it.

I understand #asDictionary as working on a collection of pairs/associations 
(because it basically goes to #withAll:).

A bag is just a collection that is optimised for many duplicates, the fact that 
you have values and counts is more an implementation detail than an intrinsic 
property.

The conversion that you want, and that already exists in #valuesAndCounts is 
one interpretation of what a bag is, not the only one. A bag is foremost a 
collection of things.

I am not immediately convinced that #valuesAndCounts should be the default 
#asDictionary interpretation.

What about the inverse for example ?

  { #foo->2. #bar->3 } asDictionary asBag.

But this is certainly an interesting discussion.

> On 6 Mar 2019, at 16:23, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:
> 
> As Richard said - as a bag is relationship between keys and frequencies, I 
> would expect it to be able to convert to a dictionary.
> 
> It displays in an inspector just like a Dictionary - which is why I figured I 
> could convert to pass it back to the exercise that was written with 
> Dictionaries in mind.
> 
> <PastedGraphic-3.png>
> 
> 
> The code to fix it is quite simple, but on these kinds of things - I thought 
> it worth checking before submitting a PR.
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
>> On 6 Mar 2019, at 13:53, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote:
>> 
>> Why would that work ? What would you expect the output to be ?
>> 
>> Try:
>> 
>>  #(1 2 3) asDictionary 
>> 
>> it fails in exactly the same way. You need key/value pairs (Associations).
>> 
>> These do work
>> 
>>  Bag new add: #foo->100; asDictionary.
>> 
>>  Bag new addAll: 'ABABABAAAA'; valuesAndCounts.
>> 
>>> On 6 Mar 2019, at 14:25, Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I was surprised to find that a Bag can’t convert to a dictionary - e.g.
>>> 
>>> Bag new 
>>>     addAll: 'aabbbbcddd’; 
>>>     asDictionary 
>>> 
>>> Gives an error - Dnu #key
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It looks to me like Bag is inheriting a bad version of #associationsDo:  
>>> and instead could simply forward it to #doWithOccurences: instead?
>>> 
>>> I know Bag is not used that much - but it comes up a lot in programming 
>>> exercises.
>>> 
>>> Tim
>> 
>> 
> 


Reply via email to