Maybe this is a dumb question - and often I’m surprised when asking these, but why is there no way to “find after” a string.
I find it rather boring to try and parse a string, after a known marker - thus: (loc := aString findString: ‘marker’) > 0 ifTrue: [ loc := loc + ‘marker’ size ]. Is there a better way? This whole pattern seems very old and clunky and not smalltalk like? Couldn’t we have: findAfter: aString ifAbsent: aBlock ? Or is there a whole better pattern for string searching that I’m missing ? Tim
