Roelof, *I* was offering to write something.
On Sat, 25 Apr 2020 at 19:47, Roelof Wobben via Pharo-users
<pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> wrote:
>
> Op 25-4-2020 om 08:30 schreef Richard Sargent:
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020, 22:25 Richard O'Keefe <rao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Roelof, I don't think CRC cards or the GRASP patterns or anything like that
>> addresses your immediate needs. Based on other questions of yours it
>> seems to me that your problem is not *organising* the responsibilities in an
>> OO program, but decomposing a problem into responsibilities in the first
>> place. I think this is perhaps the most important part of programming, and
>> the hardest to learn, not least because very few of us are good at teaching
>> it. We're not very good at teaching it in mathematics either. I do not
>> think
>> your issues are anything to do with Pharo, Smalltalk, OOP, or programming
>> as such.
>>
>> One symptom of the general problem that I've noticed is that I see code as
>> a very fluid sort of thing where pieces can be moved around and recombined,
>> while many people think of code as something solid and rather brittle.
>>
>> I was thinking of writing up a short description of what I was thinking for a
>> RosettaCode example anyway. Would that help?
>
>
> Thank you, Richard. I appreciate your offering this. I am not a teacher, so
> your help is truly appreciated!
>
>
>
> Moment, I have to look if I understand you right.
> I think you have some strong points but the last one I did not understand
> well.
>
> Do I have to write for example for a exercism challenge a short description
> of that problem like people do with rosetta code challenges and example code ?
>
> Roelof
>
