Am posing messages on GH Repo Disc Board while awaiting subscription approval to Magritte ML Sanjay
Sean P. DeNigris wrote > Sanjay Minni wrote >> > <magritte Description> >> ... Are the pragmas required > > Yes, annotating methods is how they are registered as part of the Magritte > description. There have been several non-backward-compatible Magritte > versions (currently on v. 3), so that may have been added later; note that > these methods should be on the instance side, unlike in the original > Magritte. Here is an example: > > MyClass>>#descriptionHasMetacelloConfiguration > > <magritteDescription> > ^ MABooleanDescription new > priority: 250; > accessor: #hasMetacelloConfiguration; > beReadOnly; > beRequired; > yourself > > p.s. happy to discuss here, but we also added a discussion place to the GH > repo: https://github.com/magritte-metamodel/magritte/discussions > p.p.s. there is a Magritte ML, but it doesn't get much traffic > > > > ----- > Cheers, > Sean > -- > Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html ----- cheers, Sanjay -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html