Am posing messages on GH Repo Disc Board while awaiting subscription approval
to Magritte ML
Sanjay


Sean P. DeNigris wrote
> Sanjay Minni wrote
>> 
> <magritte Description>
>> ...  Are the pragmas required
> 
> Yes, annotating methods is how they are registered as part of the Magritte
> description. There have been several non-backward-compatible Magritte
> versions (currently on v. 3), so that may have been added later; note that
> these methods should be on the instance side, unlike in the original
> Magritte. Here is an example:
> 
> MyClass>>#descriptionHasMetacelloConfiguration
>       
> <magritteDescription>
>       ^ MABooleanDescription new
>               priority: 250;
>               accessor: #hasMetacelloConfiguration;
>               beReadOnly;
>               beRequired;
>               yourself
> 
> p.s. happy to discuss here, but we also added a discussion place to the GH
> repo: https://github.com/magritte-metamodel/magritte/discussions
> p.p.s. there is a Magritte ML, but it doesn't get much traffic
> 
> 
> 
> -----
> Cheers,
> Sean
> --
> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html





-----
cheers, 
Sanjay
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html

Reply via email to