> What you can do is turning it off globally in the setting (all compiler > option are listed there) > > But take care: we can not recompile the image without optimzations as this > adds intererrupt possibilities to code that was not > interruptable before, which breaks the code in for process switching itself, > I think.
So it sounds like my daydream that inlining be turned off by default is a heavier lift than just flipping a switch, correct? In principle (ignoring the amount of work involved) what are your thoughts RE my musing: “After 40+ years of Moore’s Law, can we turn off these inlines by default?” and my hypothesis that this is an optimization that made sense at the time but now adds complexity for questionable payoff?
