Thanks a lot Nadia! Your fix has been merged in my branch and it is
pushed upstream. It will be in my PPA with the next build.
$ bzr merge lp:~nadiana/phatch/phatch-dev
M phatch/actions/save.py
M phatch/core/lib/imtools.py
M phatch/core/pil.py
All changes applied successfully.
$ bzr commit -m "white background fix"
Committing to: /home/stani/sync/python/phatch/trunk/
modified phatch/actions/save.py
modified phatch/core/pil.py
modified phatch/core/lib/imtools.py
Committed revision 939.
** Changed in: phatch
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nadia Alramli (nadiana)
--
Phatch - alteration svg > png > jpg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398704
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Phatch
Developers, which is subscribed to Phatch.
Status in Phatch = Photo & Batch!: Fix Committed
Bug description:
Such as we had discussed with Stani to the Nantes's RMLL, I place you in join
file an archive where you will find the various screen shots which will allow
you to understand the problem I met concerning the conversion of the stemming
.png of inkscape towards the .jpg format:
* 00_inkscape.svg
* 00_inkscape-export-150dpi.png
* 01_gimp_image-aplatie-enregistrement-jpg-100%.jpg
* 02_david-s_batch_processor_config_01.jpg
* 03_david-s_batch_processor_essai_01.jpg
* 04_david-s_batch_processor_config_02.jpg
* 05_david-s_batch_processor_essai_02.jpg
* 06_phatch_config.png
* 07_phatch-export.jpg
* 08_comparatif_rendus.jpg
In the file "00_inkscape.svg" you can realize that there is:
* a .png bitmap including a shade worn (which will maybe have disappeared well
in the svg, link obliges)
* a shape rectangle black with alpha 75 %
* a 3D shape
* of the (editable) text
To assure(insure) you a good comparison, I made the operation in passing:
* Directly in Gimp
(c.f.: 01_gimp_image-aplatie-enregistrement-jpg-100%.jpg)
* then by way of the plugin " Of David Batch Processor "
(c.f.: 02_david-s_batch_processor_config_01.jpg
03_david-s_batch_processor_essai_01.jpg
04_david-s_batch_processor_config_02.jpg
05_david-s_batch_processor_essai_02.jpg)
* to finish by Phatch
(c.f.: 06_phatch_config.png
07_phatch-export.jpg)
You can realize by opening the file "08_comparatif_rendus.jpg" to a 100 % view
that only the operation of conversion png > jpg made via a manual manipulation
in Gimp (to flatten the image > to record under > .jpg in 100 %) can be
considered as good rendering.
* The oblique lines become staircase with the plugin " Of David Batch Processor
" or "Phatch" but just undergoes a weak vagueness via Gimp who remains
acceptable.
* Texts are altered in the same way.
* The opaqueness of the shape rectangle black in 75 % is lost with the plugin "
Of David Batch Processor " or "Phatch", and undergoes no change via Gimp
* The .png bitmap loses a big part of its transparency at the level of the
shade worn with the plugin " Of David Batch Processor " or "Phatch", and
undergoes no change via Gimp.
After all, the results with the plugin " Of David Batch Processor " or "Phatch"
does not equal that obtained by a manual use of Gimp. = > in that very private
individual case we agree :) !!
Staying to your answer,
Itoun
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~phatch-dev
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~phatch-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
