I see. At a point there was a long discussion between Sean and me about
how we can fix that problem. I forgot the conclusion. Anyway, I know the
matter can be fixed and at some point I even had a draft fix.
Andrei
David Simcha wrote:
(Bangs head against wall.) Sorry, meant 3409, 3410.
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I'm confused. 2409 is about delegates and 2410 also looks unrelated.
I must be missing something.
FWIW I recall I did solve the large file issue.
Andrei
David Simcha wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Steve Schveighoffer
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
Will there be an unbuffered interface to file handles?
std.stdio.File wraps a FILE* which I find substandard. I don't
think D should be relying on C buffering for D-only constructs.
I actually find the whole notion of relying on libc a little
suspect, even for the standard handles.
You will find it a lot suspect if you try to work with files
over 2 GB. See bugs 2409 and 2410.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
