I think it should be enough just to make it a documented requirement for allocators. It's not like it will ever change, right?
On Jun 28, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Steve Schveighoffer wrote: > All, > > Should there be something in the runtime that defines the minimum align size > for things like memory blocks? That might make this easier to deal with from > a design perspective... > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Jason Spencer <[email protected]> >> >> Hmmm. The natural thing would be to have some type to describe these >> 128-bit values (akin to __m128 in gcc, Intel and MS compilers) and use >> sizeof on >> that. I don't see that D has any MMX/SSE intrinsics, so I don't know if >> there is a standard type. If you don't have such a thing defined by the >> compiler, I'd be tempted to define it, based on which version of the >> compiler >> will compile this code (i.e. 32- or 64-bit dmd). Then you can use that in >> your sizeof. Maybe you'll get lucky, and that will become standard >> :) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
