On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Sean Kelly wrote: > Hm... and then the mutex and condition variable in MessageBox would be > declared as shared and I suppose everything would work. I was worried that > making Mutex shared, for example, would add synchronized loads every time a > handle was used, but it looks like I'm wrong. I can't recall what rule was > provided for where synchronization is used for shared concrete variables... > can someone refresh my memory? For example, the following code has no > synchronized ops at all
I suppose the other option is that the compiler is already doing a lot more static analysis than I expected. Any chance this is it? _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
