Don Clugston wrote:
Anyway, the reason I posted the link was not so much to help with implementation, but more because it gives a great feel for what's involved in a "state of the art" FFT library. I suspect there's a sweet spot with high convenience, small code size, and good-enough performance.
The most important thing for a Phobos implementation of FFT (or any other module) is getting the API right. Having that right means we can always swap it out for a better implementation without breaking user code.
_______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
