On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > > As I'm sure you know we're trying to help the matter with library-based > approaches, but leaving straight in the language a feature that is impossible > to make safe is not admissible. Walter and I agree that scope must be > abolished.
Cast and union can't be made safe either.. should they be removed? Why not push scope out of the safed subset and leave the tool around where it's useful? _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
