checked in changeset 1962 (opDispatch is cool!).

Note that this does not completely replicate the original functionality.  The 
original was unsafe for builtin appending, this one is safe, but may yield 
strange results.

For example:

auto str = "abcdefg".idup;
auto app = appender(&str);
str ~= "hijk";
assert(app.data == "abcdefg"); // on previous version, app.data would have 
"abcdefghijk"
app.put("lmnop");
assert(str == "abcdefglmnop"); // on previous version, str would read 
"abcdefghijklmnop"

Since we can't hook builtin array appending, RefAppender cannot tell when it 
has 
been used.  Any use of builtin append will reallocate anyways.

I'd recommend examining any code that uses appender(&arr) to make sure it 
doesn't also use builtin append on the array while using the appender.  Such 
behavior was unsafe for the original version of Appender anyways.

-Steve



----- Original Message ----
> From: Steve Schveighoffer <[email protected]>
> To: Discuss the phobos library for D <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tue, September 7, 2010 7:26:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [phobos] Appender
> 
> The old method is completely different from the new one, I'm not storing a 
> pointer to an array in the implementation struct.
> 
> I'll see if I can  wrap the appender functionality.  I'll add back the 
> appender 
>
> signature  below, it will just return something different than 
> Appender!(T[]), 

> which  shouldn't be a problem as long as you use  auto.
> 
> -Steve
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From:  David Simcha <[email protected]>
> > To: Discuss  the phobos library for D <[email protected]>
> > Sent:  Sun, September 5, 2010 10:36:26 PM
> > Subject: [phobos] Appender
> > 
> > Guys,
> > 
> > Can we add back the appender signature  appender(T)(T[]* arr) as a  
>deprecated 
>
> >function?  I'm trying  to compile some libraries (specifically  Orange) that 
> >depend on  this.  IMHO it was used enough by existing code that  it needs to 
>be 
>
> >deprecated rather than immediately removed w/o  warning.
> > 
> > --Dave
> > _______________________________________________
> >  phobos  mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >  http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> > 
> 
> 
>        
> _______________________________________________
> phobos  mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> 


      
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos

Reply via email to