I think we should make some kind of decision regarding the date/time module(s) before releasing a Phobos version that contains std.stopwatch.
It would be silly to introduce a new module, only to deprecate it and move Stopwatch into std.time (or whatever) in the following release... -Lars On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 22:03 +0900, SHOO wrote: > (2010/09/09 9:48), Brad Roberts wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Brad Roberts wrote: > > > >> What's the state of the union? Er.. code base? > >> > >> IMHO, it's about time to consider cutting the next release. Who has > >> opinions on what's unfinished that they believe needs to be in it? > > > > The only regularly failing unit test is in phobos. I filed a ticket for > > it the other day: > > > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4824 > > - stopwatch unit tests fail intermitently > > > > I think it should be fixed before the release. > > I fixed. But, I didn't test it. I don't have environment repro the problem. > Will you confirm it if good? > > > BTW, I allow that revisions increase change without my permit because > the module is a part of Phobos. Of course include a change of the module > name. > Phobos Dev. > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
