On Sep 17, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Steve Schveighoffer wrote: > > In response to Sean, I think the time span type can live in core, even if > it's > used in std.time. std.datetime can easily just public include core.time. In > fact, I think I at one point had Tango set up this way (with all the > time-related core functions taking a TimeSpan), but Kris rejected it.
Yeah. The bid to make the runtime as small as possible got a bit extreme at times. I think I'll go ahead and define a TimeDuration (maybe renamed to Duration) and see how it goes. Worst case I use a name that doesn't collide with what std.datetime uses and we just have two. All I really need is a formalized way to specify timespans anyway. _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
