I think that's a good suggestion that hasn't been implemented yet. Is
there a practical reason, or just not getting to it?
Thanks,
Andrei
On 8/20/10 20:26 CDT, Shin Fujishiro wrote:
David Simcha<[email protected]> wrote:
In addition to the changes I made last night, I've also made the
following changes:
1. Change name to inputRangeObject/InputRangeObject.
2. Add support for output ranges as outputRangeObject/OutputRangeObject.
3. Remove the now ridiculous looking Hungarian notation on the interfaces.
http://pastebin.com/U83YNJfJ is where it's at.
Any more comments from anyone, or does this look ready to be checked in?
Could you make OutputRangeObject able to accept multiple element types?
template outputRangeObject(E...) {
auto outputRangeObject(R)(R range) { ... }
}
Shin
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
