I think the right approach is to build universal binaries and keep them in the folder named "lib".
-- /Jacob Carlborg On 27 mar 2011, at 01:35, Walter Bright wrote: > > > On 3/26/2011 1:26 PM, Michel Fortin wrote: >> A little while ago, there was a discussion about where to put the 32-bit >> phobos library in the DMD archive. It was finally decided that the 32-bit >> version would go to a lib32 directory, and the 64-bit one in a lib64 >> directory. >> >> That's all fine for Linux, but I brought to the discussion that on OS X the >> standard way is to create a universal binary which includes both >> architectures in one file. That's how libraries are packaged on OS X. But I >> was told, that this didn't concern OS X (yet) as the 64-bit port was (for >> now) Linux-only. Valid point. >> >> But now, I see that in the archive the OS X library has been moved to a >> lib32 directory. Was this intentional or is it an oversight? Is the plan to >> do things as they're done on Linux and not have a universal >> multi-architecture binary? >> >> Currently D for Xcode is broken by this change and I'm looking at the best >> way to fix it. In the sort term I might just change the path to point to the >> lib32 directory instead of simply "lib". But the current approach which is >> to put a symbolic link in /usr/local/lib pointing to libphobos2.a won't work >> anymore if the binary for the two architectures are kept in separate files... >> > > I don't know what the right answer is. > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
