On 31 mar 2011, at 17:57, David Simcha wrote: > In general I think this discussion is devolving into silly bikeshed issues. > I find that the stuff being discussed here doesn't have much effect on > readability (I can read code in lots of styles) but is annoying to have to > remember when writing code.
I actually do think it effects the readability when someone squeezes in to much code vertically. > I'm fully on board with specifying anything that affects the public API. For > private implementation details, though, I think inconsistency across modules > is the lesser of two evils compared to fighting all these stupid bikeshed > wars over what the One True Way will be for Phobos. I think the most > important rule is to just be consistent within a module. When maintaining a > module written by someone else, try to adapt your style to what you see. > When writing a new module, just use common sense and don't do anything > horribly unreadable. > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> > wrote: > On 3/31/11 10:13 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > I sugest people start using an editor that handles the *'s automatically. > > Mine does, but in past discussions people have complained about overly > specific requirements for editor capabilities. > > Andrei > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos > > _______________________________________________ > phobos mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos -- /Jacob Carlborg
_______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
