On 3/31/2011 1:10 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Now, it's fine with me if we don't dictate how member variables are named - as long as it's understood that they will not always match the normal naming scheme. Personally, I use a leading underscore. I also don't like it when there's mixture of styles between private member variables (e.g. some with an underscore nad some without), but that's my personal preference. The only reason I see to select a style is if we want Phobos to be consistent. But while some people think that Phobos should be highly consistent in its styling throughout, I don't think that it necessarily matters. What matters is the public API. _That_ should strive for consistency, because that affects the users of the library. The style of the implementation details does not.
I tend to agree that the public API style is far, far more important than the implementation details.
_______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
