My proposal for a new std.path is now ready for review, and it is my understanding that the same is true for David's TempAlloc. Would it be OK if we run the reviews in parallel? The two are completely independent, and AFAIK TempAlloc is meant for druntime, not Phobos.
For the curious/impatient: https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/new-std-path/std/path.d http://www.kyllingen.net/code/new-std-path/phobos-prerelease/std_path.html -Lars _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
