On 6/5/2011 12:21 PM, Robert Clipsham wrote: > On 5 June 2011 05:04, Brad Roberts <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 6/4/2011 8:55 PM, David Simcha wrote: > > On 6/4/2011 11:50 PM, Brad Roberts wrote: > >> The process is long gone, sorry. > >> > >> The box has one amd athlon 64 x2 dual core processor, 1ghz, 512kb > cache. > > ????? I'm pretty sure Athlon 64 X2's don't exist at this slow a clock > speed, unless you're underclocking. Also funny > > because, except for clock speed, this is my hardware as well and I > can't reproduce this bug after executing the > > unittests in a loop ~13,000 times. > > Hrm, looking at the kernel boot logs, it claims: > > [ 0.000000] Detected 2004.383 MHz processor. > [ 0.010011] Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated using > timer frequency.. 4008.76 BogoMIPS > (lpj=20043830) > > >From /proc/cpuinfo (where I got the 1ghz figure). Looks like it halved > the two values, which seems wrong: > > > Do you have cpufreq installed? Most distros have it by default and > under-clock your processor when it's not active > (if/when it does it depends on which policy is enabled). > > -- > Robert > http://octarineparrot.com/
Nope. _______________________________________________ phobos mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
