Aren't most print jobs sent to spools with specifics for each printer? Maybe a pid reference for an active printer can lock someone out from changing printers during in-process print jobs. Adding a printer during a large print job sounds like a real world problem. But deleting an active printer during a pending job sounds like something that would not happen in most situations. Maybe a prompt to state that a job is in process for that printer. Stop print job? Or wait until jobe done. Then a reprompt stating that the print spool has been released would be good.
Jim Elton Woo wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85797 > > Please add any comments as appropriate. > Thanks, > > Elton ;-) > -- > http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_4504.html > "You only live once, so let's make life EASIER for each other." > LINUX Registered User #193975. AMD-K7 ATHLON CPU power on board. > > > > > > -- > Phoebe-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list -- Air Force Inertia Axiom: Consistency is always easier to defend than correctness. -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
