On 2003-03-14 at 09:22:43-0500 Jef Spaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But short of providing the source code so I can actually do my own > code audit to verify redhat has patched the source ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/2.1AS/en/os/i386/SRPMS > But I guess maybe from a marketing standpoint the human readable > list of packported fixes would warm the hearts and minds of certain > pointed haired people who have purchasing oversight. PHBs don't care, and the people who *do* care already have many ways to obtain this information (RHN, the redhat-watch mailing list, the "errata" section on www.redhat.com, et. al.). This would simply be a waste of time for Red Hat. If PHBs gave a damn about distinguishing backported security fixes, Sun would've declared bankruptcy long ago. If PHBs gave a damn about security at all, Microsoft would've declared bankruptcy long ago. -- James Ralston, Information Technology Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
