On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:44:58AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:38:02AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:29:07PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > > > It is simply "Red Hat Linux 9", no ".0". Quite similar to "Red > > > Hat Linux 7" in the naming aspect. > > And I sure do see "7.0" on your FTP server now.... :) > > Also on this page: <https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh7-errata.html> > "Red Hat Linux 7.0 General Advisories". So you can see why people may not be > taking your nine-point-nothing thing too seriously.
Oops, you caught us. In the interest of being totally transparent, "Red Hat Linux 7" was something that happened much closer to its release than the Red Hat Linux 9 decision. There weren't many good reasons to call it 7 and not 7.0. There ARE good reasons drop the .0 from Red Hat Linux 9. It's not a .0 release, it's just the next release. Cheers, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matt Wilson Manager, Base Operating Systems Red Hat, Inc. -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
