On Wednesday 26 March 2003 08:57, David Krider wrote: > Laugh all you like. You missed my point entirely. I'm well aware of all > the different ways you can install RedHat linux. > > The iso's are by far the most *convenient* for a single workstation or > three. By asking people to buy a boxed set to get those, I think it > would be more-significant stream of income for RedHat. Indeed, why > *should* I pay for the iso's when my workplace has 2 T1's, I have DSL, > and two of my co-workers have cable? But I, for one, would be very > willing to part with the money for a boxed set if that was the only way > to get the iso's.
At that point, you'd see plenty more people leach an entire directory tree, to duplicate installs locally. FTP based installes go much quicker when the FTP server exists on the same 100[0]mb/s switched lan. -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE http://geek.j2solutions.net Mondo DevTeam (http://www.microwerks.net/~hugo/) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
