-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 18:34:13 -0500, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 18:16, Charles Griffin wrote: > > This is just a guess, though. > > yep this is all guessing and mental masturbation. maybe I made the main > point of my post about these rhn options a bit too subtle... > there is a phone number to call for sales questions. Anyone who really > cares about this issue should be using the phone number. At this point > I'm assuming anyone who keeps posting about these issue to the beta list > are just freeloading posting-junkies, like myself, who have no real > intention to ever buy any of these product, and just like wasting > bandwidth by exploring the boundary of the definition of spam. Actually, public feedback on what users and potential customers think about the comprehensibility and clearness of Red Hat's product information pages, and what they think about the pricing itself, is far more interesting and relevant than any attempts on cutting down the remaining traffic on this (probably already dying) list. I think the sales department would revise the web pages if they got many repetitive questions by phone. But consider all those visitors who don't call them and who misunderstand the pricing model. Imagine someone got a false picture and ordered and later learned that the renewal of the annual subscription is much more expensive. Surely something you would to avoid, even if it were only once. It doesn't really matter on what mailing-list this comes up. As you know, people from Red Hat read these lists, too. - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+g5VQ0iMVcrivHFQRAkp5AJoDSU3cTAiqnHBvez9miBBPmtDckgCeP6fL EHxbKoedVdUliXTDEiGk1xg= =ctfk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
