On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 04:48:58AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > Well, F@&#! Why didn't I think of that? Thanks for clarifying the > situation with your outstanding, clear understanding of the GPL.
No need for that kind of attitude. > > The terms I propose would allow _exactly_ that. See the Open RTLinux > > Patent License for an FSF-approved example. > The RTLinux patent license grants unlimited distribution rights to GPL'd > software, even if you sell it for profit. Thompson offers no such > license, to the best of my knowledge. That doesn't mean that they *wouldn't*. Did you actually read what I said? I suspect not. -- Matthew Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
