On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Tom Diehl wrote:
>
> >Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 21:29:19 -0500 (EST)
> >From: Tom Diehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> >List-Id: <phoebe-list.redhat.com>
> >Subject: Re: nano editor in Shrike?
> >
> >On 31 Mar 2003, Michael Wardle wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 12:01, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> > Um, I thought pine was depreciated, not fully removed yet. Am I wrong?
> >>
> >> Yes, you're right, it's *deprecated*. ;-)
> >>
> >> Someone recently made a post sounding quite annoyed at its removal, so I
> >> assumed it must have been removed, but a little research confirms it's
> >> merely deprecated.
> >>
> >> Anyway, it would still be nice for there to be a lightweight
> >> command-line editor that is easy to learn. Nano has been included in
> >> the past, and I hope Red Hat will again include it in future.
> >
> >Does it not have the same licansing problem pine has?? I love pine and hate
> >to see it depreciated (which means it will eventaully go) but I can see
> >why they are doing that. It has to be a pita to maintain.
> >
> >Maybe it is time to look for a replacment.
>
> "deprecated", not "depreciated". 2 words spelled similarly, and
> of which have similar but different meaning. Don't mean to
> nitpick, but this is one of those "word pet peeves". ;o)
Sorry, I was tired. ;o)
--
.............Tom "Nothing would please me more than being able to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hire ten programmers and deluge the hobby market
with good software." -- Bill Gates 1976
We are still waiting ....
--
Phoebe-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
