On 31 Mar 2003, Michael Wardle wrote: >A user on this list recently mentioned that he liked pico as a text >editor, and was disappointed that pine had been removed from the Shrike >distribution.
Well, he'll be happy to find out that pine has in fact *not* been removed from Shrike, and hence neither has pico. >I understand Red Hat's reasons for removing pine, however I am a >little surprised to not see packages for the GNU pico clone >"nano" in Phoebe 3, and suspect it is therefore not included in >Shrike. I find this odd, because I'm pretty sure it was >included in previous releases, including Valhalla. > >A number of newbie users seem to prefer nano over vi or emacs, so I'd >like Red Hat to consider once again including nano in its distribution >package set, particularly now that pine and pico are gone. See above. -- Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat -- Phoebe-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
