Hi Luis,

On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 02:35:01PM -0600, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Luis Garcia <[email protected]>
> 
> It was documented in DT, but not implemented.

Good catch :-)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Garcia <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
> index f0bd72f241e4..5de71cb7c1ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx258.c
> @@ -699,6 +699,7 @@ struct imx258 {
>       unsigned int csi2_flags;
>  
>       struct gpio_desc *powerdown_gpio;
> +     struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
>  
>       /*
>        * Mutex for serialized access:
> @@ -1250,7 +1251,11 @@ static int imx258_power_on(struct device *dev)
>               regulator_bulk_disable(IMX258_NUM_SUPPLIES, imx258->supplies);
>       }
>  
> -     return ret;
> +     gpiod_set_value_cansleep(imx258->reset_gpio, 0);
> +

I think you can remove this new line here.

> +     usleep_range(400, 500);
> +
> +     return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int imx258_power_off(struct device *dev)
> @@ -1260,6 +1265,7 @@ static int imx258_power_off(struct device *dev)
>  
>       clk_disable_unprepare(imx258->clk);
>  
> +     gpiod_set_value_cansleep(imx258->reset_gpio, 1);
>       gpiod_set_value_cansleep(imx258->powerdown_gpio, 1);
>  
>       regulator_bulk_disable(IMX258_NUM_SUPPLIES, imx258->supplies);
> @@ -1573,6 +1579,12 @@ static int imx258_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>       if (IS_ERR(imx258->powerdown_gpio))
>               return PTR_ERR(imx258->powerdown_gpio);
>  
> +     /* request optional reset pin */
> +     imx258->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&client->dev, "reset",
> +                                                  GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> +     if (IS_ERR(imx258->reset_gpio))
> +             return PTR_ERR(imx258->reset_gpio);
> +
>       /* Initialize subdev */
>       v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&imx258->sd, client, &imx258_subdev_ops);
>  

Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Tommaso Merciai <[email protected]>

> -- 
> 2.44.0
> 
> 

Reply via email to