Walt:
Do you happen to know the actual wax formula that Victor used?

Rich



On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 19:05:13 -0500, Walt wrote:

>For those machines that I refer to by personal experience, it is clearly the
>case that the finish came as Golden Oak Waxed directly from the factory. The
>data in "Look for the Dog" is referring to factory finishes (that is, how
>they left the factory) and is an objective account based on actual
>production records.

>I don't know what you mean by "previously stripped." Are you asking if the
>cabinet was originally finished with shellac which was then removed while it
>was still in the factory (and before it was ever shipped)? If so, the answer
>is, "definitely not." Aside from the technical impossibilities, I do not
>believe that Victor's manufacturing process would have accommodated such an
>expensive process for producing what is intended to be an economical finish.
>The idea of stripping a cabinet at the factory only to then wax the stained
>finish is radically counterproductive as I estimate it.

>An old shellac/varnish finish can be removed, but it is impossible to remove
>every trace of it - totally impossible. This is one of the ways I am able to
>tell if a finish is original and even what the finish originally was if it
>has been redone or coated at some later point. A minuscule amount of shellac
>will always remain in some crease, open pore, nail hole, seam, etc. Once the
>raw oak grain absorbs any of the shellac's resin by way of the denatured
>alcohol, it leaves a fingerprint forever. Short of total cabinet disassembly
>and sanding maybe 10% of every surface away, those forensic pieces of
>Victrola DNA are there for good.

>I guess I am a little stumped as to why people think it so odd for wood to
>be merely finished with wax, because such a finish is often seen in
>furniture of the period, generally. It is, in the bigger picture of
>furniture finishes (which I am sure Eldridge Johnson's boys were plenty
>skilled at - at least until about 1917 or so), not at all unusual.

>I am well aware of the many "magical" chemical finishes like "Howard's
>Destroy-A-Finish" and tinted waxes mentioned by Rich that are available on
>the market, and it may well be the case that such an product was applied to
>the machine you mentioned initially, but without at least seeing pictures of
>the machine or preferably asking the seller some questions I couldn't be so
>quick to suspect it as a boogered-finish. Knowing eBay? It might be ten
>times worse than you think. But it may be legit. (Any luck finding that
>auction number?)

>Walt






>-----Original Message-----
>From: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org [mailto:phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org] On
>Behalf Of bkasindorf
>Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 12:52 PM
>To: Antique Phonograph List
>Subject: Re: [Phono-L] GOW finish

>Thanks,
>But does this mean it was previously stripped and this kind of finish added
>later? Did Victor ever ship a phono with this kind of finish from the
>factory?
>-Barry


>On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 09:22:18 -0600, "Rich" <rich-m...@octoxol.com> wrote:
>> Google is a wonderful invention.
>> 
>> Try this,
>> URL: 
>>
>http://www.architecturals.net/restore/home.cfm?page=productdisplay&CategoryI
>D=36&SubcategoryID=112&ProductID=2662&Start=1
>> 
>> Cut and paste back together as required.
>> 
>> This is nothing more than colored wax...  Your basic CRAPA-FINISH
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 6:41:52 -0800, bkasindorf wrote:
>> 
>>

>_______________________________________________
>Phono-L mailing list
>Phono-L@oldcrank.org

>Phono-L Archive
>http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/

>Phono-L RSS Feed
>http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/feed/index.rss

>Support Phono-L
>http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank

>-- 
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.28/604 - Release Date: 12/26/2006
> 

>_______________________________________________
>Phono-L mailing list
>Phono-L@oldcrank.org

>Phono-L Archive
>http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/archive/

>Phono-L RSS Feed
>http://phono-l.oldcrank.org/feed/index.rss

>Support Phono-L
>http://www.cafepress.com/oldcrank


Reply via email to