We all know that the Grand Canyon was made by water running over rock. 
Anytime two physical objects contact, there is wear, or damage. That said, the 
reason I collect antique phonographs is because I like the sound for whatever 
psychological reason. While I will not play my Nordskog of Spikes Seven Pods of 
Pepper Orchestra on a Victrola, I have no problem playing almost everything 
else 
on some kind of antique phonograph. To be sure I always use a fresh needle and 
sometimes a fibre needle. I once played a Paul Whiteman record on a VV-IV as 
many times as I could to see if I could detect wear. I got sick of the record 
before I could hear an increase in surface noise. Victor had a wear test that 
in order to pass, a record had to be played 200 times without audible wear 
(would that Paramount had the same kind of standard). 20 times is more than I 
care to hear most records. I think we can play our records and enjoy them 
without 
pangs of conscience. When we are through with them they will, at best, be 
absorbed into archives where they will be played once, put onto digital media, 
and (the originals) never heard again! The digital copies however, with help 
from new copyright laws, may live again on MP3 players. In the mean time, I 
will 
play my Carusos (if I had a Zonophone I might make an exception), McCormacks, 
Original Indiana Fives and Bessie Smiths the way God intended, on a taking 
machine. Pardon my ramblings, I found this to be an interesting string of 
comments.
 
Phil Stewart



**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & 
Finance.      (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
From [email protected]  Fri Mar  7 09:56:29 2008
From: [email protected] (Rich)
Date: Fri Mar  7 10:01:22 2008
Subject: [Phono-L] Shellac records and damage from steel needles
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: 
<[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]>
       
<[email protected]><[email protected]>
        <[email protected]>
        <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

Your problem might be that the cartridge is obsolete.  Try the link to 
the current catalog.

https://system.netsuite.com/core/media/media.nl?id=11886&c=ACCT106601&h=ea8eb7f71c2eceb07b71&_xt=.pdf&ck=0SLNvAETASXUXWIJ&vid=0SLNvAETAVXUXRX-&cktime=401&cart=4827670

Ron L wrote:
> AFAIK, Stanton does not supply new styli for the 6000 series cart.  I'd have
> gotten a 6027 if I could but as it turned out I got it retipped with a nice
> 3 mil diamond which works better anyway.
> 
> Ron
From [email protected]  Fri Mar  7 10:49:19 2008
From: [email protected] (Ron L)
Date: Fri Mar  7 10:49:49 2008
Subject: [Phono-L] Shellac records and damage from steel needles
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: 
<[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]>
       
<[email protected]><[email protected]>
        <[email protected]><[email protected]>
        <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

I know the cartridge is obsolete (if by that you mean, old).  I bought it in
1974.  It is on the downstairs turntable I now use only for 78s.  If I'd
gotten a 500 series or a 6800 series, I could still get styli easy.  After
I'd had the retip done I did find a source for new ones in Japan but the
retip turned out to be less expensive.

Ron L

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Rich
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 12:56 PM
To: Antique Phonograph List
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Shellac records and damage from steel needles

Your problem might be that the cartridge is obsolete.  Try the link to 
the current catalog.

https://system.netsuite.com/core/media/media.nl?id=11886&c=ACCT106601&h=ea8e
b7f71c2eceb07b71&_xt=.pdf&ck=0SLNvAETASXUXWIJ&vid=0SLNvAETAVXUXRX-&cktime=40
1&cart=4827670

Ron L wrote:
> AFAIK, Stanton does not supply new styli for the 6000 series cart.  I'd
have
> gotten a 6027 if I could but as it turned out I got it retipped with a
nice
> 3 mil diamond which works better anyway.
> 
> Ron
_______________________________________________
Phono-L mailing list
http://phono-l.oldcrank.org

Reply via email to