Hi Devs, I have attached a sample composite file for the PersonService to the JIRA [0]. Please be kind enough to let me know the validity of it so that I can improve and add for other services.
[0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12488001/personservice.composite Thanks, ~Umashanthi On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Umashanthi Pavalanathan < [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Umashanthi Pavalanathan >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Sounds good, and I have couple little questions : >> >> >> >> What can be an activity ? >> >> >> > >> > Activity can be any action of a user. eg: Adding a new album, tagging a >> > photo, commenting on a photo, rating etc. >> > So, to make use of this concept of "activity", when a user performs such >> > actions in PhotArk, they should be recorded as "activities" of that >> user. >> > >> >> Ok, so most of the time activities will be generated by the PhotArk >> system when user interact with the application (e.g. new album, new >> comment, etc) >> > > +1 > > >> >> >> >> What can be an AppData ? >> >> >> > >> > AppData is actually any name-value pair data we want to store for a >> user. >> > For eg if the user have done any configurations(i.e: property settings), >> > those details can be saved as name-value pairs. I don't see any usage of >> > this in PhotArk currently; but believe that this can be utilized in >> future. >> > >> >> +1 >> >> > >> >> What's the scenario for updating a "activity" or "appdata"... just >> >> curious as other places such as Twitter, Facebook seem to only allow >> >> updates/delete and not really updates for some performance reasons. >> >> >> > >> > Yes, true. But in the case of appdata, updating an appdata entry will be >> OK >> > I guess. >> > >> > With respect to "activity" what I had in mind is updating a "comment" on >> a >> > photo or something like that. But even that can be recorded as another >> > "activity". So, the "update" might not be used considering performance >> > issues as you said; but I added it to have a complete set of operations >> on >> > "activity". >> > >> > Hope I have answered the questions you had. >> > >> >> Yes, all answered. >> >> It seems that these are going to be most of the time used as read only >> (at least for the scenarios we currently going to have).. this might >> help simplify the rest api if needed. >> > > OK; I will think about that and discuss further here. > > > Thanks, > ~Umashanthi > > >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> > >
