ID:               17098
 Comment by:       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reported By:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status:           Bogus
 Bug Type:         Apache2 related
 Operating System: custom linux
 PHP Version:      4.0CVS-2002-05-08
 New Comment:

This is still not fixed... PHP code needs modifying.
I have tried PHP 4.2.3 and 4.3.0-pre1 with Apache 2.0.43
running on RedHat 6.2, and it still returns erroneous 304s.

The following is what I 'borrowed' from the Apache's
mod_include.c, which seems working within PHP 4.2.3.


--- sapi/apache2filter/sapi_apache2.c~  Fri Aug 16 07:27:03 2002
+++ sapi/apache2filter/sapi_apache2.c   Mon Oct 14 23:27:26 2002
@@ -558,14 +558,24 @@
        return OK;
 }

+static int includes_setup(ap_filter_t *f)
+{
+    /* We will ALWAYS set the no_local_copy value to 1 so
+     * that we will not send 304s.
+     */
+    f->r->no_local_copy = 1;
+
+    return OK;
+}
+
 static void php_register_hook(apr_pool_t *p)
 {
        ap_hook_pre_config(php_pre_config, NULL, NULL,
APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
        ap_hook_post_config(php_apache_server_startup, NULL, NULL,
APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
        ap_hook_insert_filter(php_insert_filter, NULL, NULL,
APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
        ap_hook_post_read_request(php_post_read_request, NULL, NULL,
APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
-       ap_register_output_filter("PHP", php_output_filter, NULL,
AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE);
-       ap_register_input_filter("PHP", php_input_filter, NULL,
AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE);
+       ap_register_output_filter("PHP", php_output_filter,
includes_setup, AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE);
+       ap_register_input_filter("PHP", php_input_filter,
includes_setup, AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE);
 }

 AP_MODULE_DECLARE_DATA module php4_module = {


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2002-09-30 20:24:19] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sorry, but the bug system is not the appropriate forum for asking
support questions. Your problem does not imply a bug in PHP itself.
For a list of more appropriate places to ask for help using PHP,
please visit http://www.php.net/support.php

Thank you for your interest in PHP.

This is an Apache 2 bug. 
According to http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9673
this bug has been corrected in Apache 2.0.42 and later.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2002-08-16 03:56:57] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sir, you are correct in your analysis.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2002-08-15 13:30:40] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

3+ months later and this still happens with Apache 2.0.40 and PHP
snapshot php4-200208150600 !!!  Seems that PHP developers view Apache2
as pre-alpha and they don't want to touch it with a 10-foot stick.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2002-07-20 10:54:57] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'd like to post a workaround without patching apache or PHP....

Just edit your script(s) to send a 'header("Last-Modified: Mon, 26 Jul
1997 05:00:00 GMT");' or just some other date older than the mdate of
your script file. This solves the problem.

Reason:
The bug causes Apache2 to look for the mdate of the .php file to
determine if it has been modified.
If the browser first gets a header like above, it next time asks for
the page with an 'If-Modified-Since: Mon, 26 Jul 1997 05:00:00 GMT'.
Then, the httpd looks at the mdate of your script, which is always
newer and says: Yes, it has been modified, "200 OK". The script will be
served and it will response again with the header line from above.
Round and round the story goes. :))

Greets, and have fun!

Daniel

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2002-07-10 13:43:02] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Status -> Open
Apache devs are still argueing whether this is a bug in Apache or in
PHP :)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at
    http://bugs.php.net/17098

-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=17098&edit=1

Reply via email to