ID: 47184
Updated by: der...@php.net
Reported By: guilhermebla...@php.net
Status: Bogus
Bug Type: Date/time related
Operating System: *
PHP Version: 5.2.8
New Comment:
tbh, I don't think we should change this either...
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2009-01-22 15:03:20] guilhermebla...@php.net
Ilia,
It's not a case of being short or full format.
It's a matter of consistency.
Even this value is valid: 20090122T130112Z0200
The question here is that both DATE_ISO8601 and date('c') should be
consistent, since they refer to the same format.
I am just forwarding what I've heard not only once, but a couple of
times from different work teams about this mismatch.
Regards,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2009-01-22 14:34:54] il...@php.net
One is basic and the other is extended format, both are valid.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2009-01-21 17:07:06] guilhermebla...@php.net
Description:
------------
Following the documentation, DATE_ISO8601 contains this syntax:
2005-08-15T15:52:01+0000
Also, date('c') documents that: ISO 8601 date (added in PHP 5)
2004-02-12T15:19:21+00:00
We should keep consistency when supporting this spec.
I propose the change then to DATE_ISO8601 constant, defined in
ext/date/php_date.c, line 714:
- #define DATE_FORMAT_ISO8601 "Y-m-d\\TH:i:sO"
+ #define DATE_FORMAT_ISO8601 "Y-m-d\\TH:i:sP"
Reproduce code:
---------------
echo DATE_ISO8601 === date('c') ? 'true' : 'false';
Expected result:
----------------
true
Actual result:
--------------
false
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=47184&edit=1
