ID:               34502
 Comment by:       spidgorny at gmail dot com
 Reported By:      goat at daholygoat dot com
 Status:           Open
 Bug Type:         Feature/Change Request
 Operating System: Linux
 PHP Version:      5.0.5
 New Comment:

Here's the ugly trick how to do object instantiation and chaining in
one line:

        $view->loginForm = end($_ = array(
                $l = new Login(),
                $l->render()->chain()->everything()->you()->like()
        ));

$_ and $l are two unnecessary variables. I told you - it's ugly.

Anybody can make it better?
Any ETA for implementing it in PHP directly?
Hello visitor. Please vote.


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2005-09-16 10:00:51] goat at daholygoat dot com

@Johannes:
I don't really get your interpretion of the problem. A() is of course
the constructor (A() in A). The constructor returns an object of type A.
returnStr() is a method of A, so when calling returnStr() on a new A(),
it should invoke returnStr() on a new object of A. For example, in Java
it's fine to do this:
System.out.println(new Object().toString());
Which makes sense because when you _can_ do method chaining (which you
can in PHP5), there are many times where you just want to call one chain
on a new object, instead of seperately instantiating the class.
So I have to go with Derick pointing out it's simply not supported
right now.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2005-09-14 23:25:33] johan...@php.net

By reading the code I'd expect that A is some function    
returning an object. returnStr() being a method of that    
object returning a class name used for new. (Somehow a    
combination of "new $a;" and a simple   
"function_call()->methodCallOnReturnedObject()" which is   
possible since PHP 5) I would like some syntax like this,   
too - but thinking about it I see too much confusion and   
didn't find a nice solution which is clear when reading   
code.   
   
I set this to bogus since I think it's too much confusion,  
but if you have a nice and clear syntax feel free to  
re-open it - I'd be happy, but don't see how this is  
possible without logic conflicts :-)  

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2005-09-14 21:26:50] der...@php.net

I think this is simply not supported right now, so marking as a Feature
Request

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2005-09-14 21:14:57] goat at daholygoat dot com

Description:
------------
When doing method chaining on a constructor (without seperately
instantiating the object first), a parse error occurs. 

Reproduce code:
---------------
class A
{
    private $str;

    function A($str)
    {
        $this->str = $str;
    }

    function returnStr()
    {
        return $str;
    }
}

echo new A("hello")->returnStr();

Expected result:
----------------
The reference to an object of A created with A's constructor would
allow me to call returnStr() on it.

Actual result:
--------------
I'm getting a parse error.

PHP Parse error:  parse error, unexpected T_OBJECT_OPERATOR, expecting
',' or ';'


------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=34502&edit=1

Reply via email to