ID: 50930 Comment by: kmcgrail at apache dot org Reported By: nathan dot kessler at hushmail dot me Status: Assigned Bug Type: Date/time related Operating System: SuSE 7.3 i386 / gcc version 2.95 PHP Version: 5.*, 6 Assigned To: jani New Comment:
In my previous comment, I referred to the wrong patch. I meant to say remove 291371. The cookie warning from 286508 is good and valid IMO. OK, so I believe the patch in 291371 definitely is causing the issue in combination with older GCC's. Here's the testing I've done: PHP 5.2.12 compiled by gcc 3.2.3 - SquirrelMail 1.2.19 works as well as PHPMyAdmin 2.11.10. PHP 5.2.12 compiled by gcc 2.9.6 - SM 1.2.19 is broken with the error "You must be logged in to access this page." PHPMyAdmin sporadically triggers "Warning: Expiry date cannot have a year greater then 9999" Finally, PHP 5.2.12 compiled with revision 291371 removed with GCC 2.96 - PHPMyadmin & SquirrelMail works. So I think the issue is with the llabs call as you expected and my experience confirms it. If you have a patch you want me to test, let me know. Previous Comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2010-02-04 01:33:04] kmcgrail at apache dot org Upon upgrading to PHP 5.2.12, we had issues such as Warning: Expiry date cannot have a year greater then 9999 Upon reviewing this bug and looking at http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=286508, I recompiled php with gcc 3.2.3. I had been using the RH Version 2.96 for compatibility with previous compilation reasons. In CGI and Apache mode, we could NOT replicate the date showing the wrong years below. However, AFTER recompiling with gcc3.2.3, the expiry error was not showing up in phpmyadmin AND squirrelmail 1.4.19's cookies appeared to be working better. I am reverting to a version compiled with the older gcc to see if the problem replicates. If it does, I will remove 286508 from the php code and see if it replicates there as well. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2010-02-03 23:28:37] j...@php.net Oops, that bug was no warning but an error. So can't really just revert.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2010-02-03 23:26:34] j...@php.net I'm considering reverting the patch for fixing bug #50266 since that was only a warning anyway..need to investigate a bit more though. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2010-02-03 22:47:21] nathan dot kessler at hushmail dot me It's defined with 1: /* Define if you have the llabs function. */ #define HAVE_LLABS 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2010-02-03 22:27:26] j...@php.net What exactly is HAVE_LLABS defined in your main/php_config.h file? (in the build) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at http://bugs.php.net/50930 -- Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=50930&edit=1
