Edit report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54250&edit=1

 ID:                 54250
 Updated by:         ras...@php.net
 Reported by:        maciej at wiercinski dot net
 Summary:            date_default_timezone_set stat()'s whole
                     /usr/share/zoneinfo upon first call
 Status:             Bogus
 Type:               Bug
 Package:            Date/time related
 Operating System:   Linux 2.6
 PHP Version:        5.3.5
 Block user comment: N
 Private report:     N

 New Comment:

No it won't. You can distribute a binary pecl extension without needing
"PECL". 

I'm not even sure what you mean by "PECL" here. An individual pecl
extension is 

just a simple shared library. Nothing more.


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-03-17 00:02:47] maciej at wiercinski dot net

ras...@php.net: 



It will still force them to distribute PECL (may be a concern for people


building embedded/very small systems shipped with PHP). 



I don't really know PHP code, had just a very brief look at the patch
itself and 

related functions, so what I'm saying may be completely invalid. What
about 

compiling timezone data into dynamically loaded library, which they
could ship 

separately of PECL/PHP itself / easily replace with calls to theirs?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-03-16 22:56:15] ras...@php.net

Why not just make pecl/timezone dependent on the system timezone update.
It seems 

easy enough to me. Your PHP package depends on pecl/timezone and
pecl/timezone 

depends on the system timezone package. That should keep it all in
synch.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-03-16 22:52:34] maciej at wiercinski dot net

johan...@php.net: 



I can see at least two problems Debian (and other distribution)
maintainers will 

have with the solution you have proposed. They would have to make PHP
dependent 

on PECL, which is currently not the case (at least not in Debian). On
other hand 

it will eventually lead to a situation in which PHP's timezone update
has been 

rolled out and system's not, or vice-versa.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-03-16 18:56:32] johan...@php.net

vJust a small comment on



> The PHP tzdata changes are mixed in with the

> mainline development, and sometimes depend on

> other changes within the engine, so it's not

> really feasible to cherry pick out the changes

> into a stable release, even if we wanted to.



This is not true. Distributions can distribute the timezone update using
the pecl/timzeone package. No messing with engine stuff needed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2011-03-15 18:52:29] seanius at debian dot org

Hi guys,



We'll take up further discussion on the bug over there, but thought I
would cut/paste the (slightly amended) initial response here just for
posterity's sake.



===



Hi Maciej,



Does this actually cause a quantifiable and significant performance

regression?  This possibility of performance issues was discussed some

time ago but it was decided that the stat calls would just hit the
kernel

fs cache and not cause any serious problems.



If there are indeed problems, there are certainly ways this could be

worked around, but it would add even further complexity

to the patch which we'd all prefer to avoid if possible.





To give you some extra background, since the PHP authors certainly have

their own take on the situation: EVERY serious linux distribution

ships this patch in some form.  Redhat, Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, SLES,

Opensuse (okay, maybe not Gentoo, but anyway...) all ship with this
patch.

So please keep that in mind when you here both sides of this argument
:)





The problem is that when the OS distributors release a timezone update,

they don't want to *also* have to go package by package updating

individual and "customized" timezone databases that might be embedded

in a given application.  Neither do they want to continuously update
the

version of PHP in their "stable" releases and have to deal with the
numerous

regressions that would result.  The PHP tzdata changes are mixed in with
the

mainline development, and sometimes depend on other changes within the

engine, so it's not really feasible to cherry pick out the changes into

a stable release, even if we wanted to.



This is a point of disagreement with the PHP authors, who want to have

control over this aspect of the engine themselves (and they certainly
have

their justifications, such as systems with outdated or nonexistant
tzdata,

plus they add some extra TZ annotations in their private copy).

Unfortunately they are not interested in providing any other way to
work

around this issue, despite the periodic overture from us or RedHat.

The invitation is still open to try and find a reasonable technical

solution for this, but I have been led to beleive that Derick has
really

dug in his heels on the issue and it's not worth any of our time to

raise a big stink about it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------


The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at

    http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54250


-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=54250&edit=1

Reply via email to