Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=60161&edit=1
ID: 60161 Comment by: [email protected] Reported by: [email protected] Summary: Implementing an interface extending Traversable is order dependent Status: Open Type: Bug Package: Scripting Engine problem PHP Version: 5.4.0beta2 Block user comment: N Private report: N New Comment: Yes, exactly. That's what I was trying to do when I encountered the issue. Previous Comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2011-11-02 17:16:29] [email protected] You mean for a type hint which says "traversable and having that function"? That might indeed be a valid reason I didn't think about .. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2011-11-02 14:44:55] [email protected] @johannes: How could you then hint that a class must be Traversable in some way (either Iterator or Aggregate)? Or shouldn't that be possible at all? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2011-11-02 12:21:47] [email protected] Actually we should forbid extending Traversable. This should only only only be used by internal classes (Iterator, iteratorAggregate or classes providing the C get_iterator hooks) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2011-10-28 18:45:18] [email protected] Description: ------------ When implementing an interface which extends Traversable together with one of the concrete Traversable implementations (i.e. Iterator or IteratorAggregate) the latter must be named first in order to not throw an error. Compare: http://codepad.viper-7.com/OJt8XN http://codepad.viper-7.com/1AnU5Z Responsible code: http://lxr.php.net/xref/PHP_5_4/Zend/zend_interfaces.c#zend_implement_traversable ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=60161&edit=1
