Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63618&edit=1

 ID:                 63618
 Updated by:         [email protected]
 Reported by:        roman dot hlynovskiy at gmail dot com
 Summary:            filesize returns negative values for big files
-Status:             Closed
+Status:             Duplicate
 Type:               Bug
 Package:            Filesystem function related
 Operating System:   linux
 PHP Version:        5.3.19
 Block user comment: N
 Private report:     N

 New Comment:

Nobody said this feature won't be implemented at some point.

However, you are not a customer but a user. Most of us do this for free and 
during 
their free time. Contributions are welcome, we have RFCs to get new features 
in, 
etc. Feel free to step in.

ps: re set duplicate status as we have other report for this request


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-11-29 12:34:58] roman dot hlynovskiy at gmail dot com

My proposal was clear an straightforward - fix the problem and let other module 
developers think of compatibility. And I don't see a reason why should I (as an 
end user) make an 'analysis of problem' or suggest which data types should be 
used - this is dev job to find a solution. 
Whenever I leave my car at dealer's maintenance I don't expect dealer to tell 
me his story of making it so hard to fix my car and I don't see much difference 
for this case.
Nevertheless I got your point and really wish you guys go from 'tech-centric' 
to 'customer-centric' approach otherwise all those 77% (which are decreasing by 
the way last years) will suddenly drop below 30.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-11-29 10:45:34] [email protected]

Excuse me but where is your proposal?

What does release cycles or management (Btw, we do have a release management 
process since 5.4.0) have to do with LFS support?

And what do you propose? Should we (php developers) go out and fix the hundred 
of external projects used by PHP and PHP extensions?

What is your analysis on this problem besides 'it does not work'?

What do you suggest for 64bit integer or size_t to be exposed on all supported 
platforms? Using double? Add a new type?

So please, before you go down the word and blame us for being bad at our jobs 
(amazingly enough, 77% of the website world wild use php, so we may be not so 
bad), do your homework and learn the how&why about your feature request.

Thanks for your understanding and feedback.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-11-29 10:41:47] [email protected]

Fix summary

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-11-29 10:36:22] roman dot hlynovskiy at gmail dot com

Yep, I have a constructive proposal. I have 10y+ experience working for 1000+ 
company, so according to my experience a project created to solve a particular 
problem will either become never-ending story or will be realized by the time 
no one needs it.

I agree - there are thousands of module ecosystem around php, but all those 
testing efforts should be made by the module-developers and their user 
ecosystem, not the core php team. I am not quite familiar with php development 
approach, but for example linux way looks rather effective. stable stuff goes 
to even-numbered releases, test stuff goes to odd-numbered releases. 

I am pretty sure this is not the only bug waiting for 'big project to bang' and 
fix it. So my proposal would be to collect all those bugs, fix all of them in 
one shot and provide non-stable -bugshot release for those who will be willing 
to test it within their app ecosystem.

Also try to understand the situation from user-perspective. If there is a bug, 
which has several pages of workarounds published on the official page and most 
probably it has been in place for ages, it looks like something is wrong with 
bug-fix approach in php. If this is so - how can I trust a product, which might 
have a critical bug affecting overall system performance (for example) for my 
product and which could have never been fixed. I would never feel comfortable 
in this situation.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2012-11-27 10:59:53] [email protected]

PHP's internal integer type is a signed `long`. with 32bit 2336962885 is out of 
range. While properly printing it gives you the correct value: 

php -r 'printf("%u", -1958004411);'
2336962885

Besides that there are projects for large file support (while that's not as 
relevant on most 64bit systems [except windows 64bit] these days where it works 
out of the box) and for aritrary size "integer" types. But both projects aren't 
trivial due to the wayand amount of 3rd party libraries PHP interacts with. If 
you have a constructive proposal/solution for those we're more than happy to 
implement those, though.

------------------------------------------------------------------------


The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at

    https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63618


-- 
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63618&edit=1

Reply via email to