On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Marcus B�rger wrote:
>
> > Have you looked at smart_strs? That's the way to go, if you
> > want to get rid of nasty size calculations/checks and ugly
> > memcpy calls.
>
> Basically spprintf was designed to be an easy replacement for
> all the other sprintf derivates. But perhaps i should have used
> the smart strings inside it. Maybe we wouldnt have the floating
> point problem with more than 512 digits?
I don't know (haven't followed the thread -- what kind of fp
implementation does have 512 digits?).
If you can, please avoid such code as in the posted diff.
smart_strs are just so much more convenient. The resulting
code is also way more maintainable and less error prone.
- Sascha
--
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
