Should these functions really go into the core? Perhaps they are better off in an extension (pecl/array_utils ?)
The names aren't really all that obvious to me either. --Wez. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrey Hristov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:37 PM Subject: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src /ext/standard array.c basic_functions.c php_array.h > andrey Tue Sep 23 13:37:29 2003 EDT > > Modified files: > /php-src/ext/standard array.c basic_functions.c php_array.h > Log: > 4 new functions : > array_udiff() > array_udiff_assoc() > array_diff_uassoc() > array_udiff_uassoc() > They work like array_diff() or array_diff_assoc() but callback function(s) > can be used to perform the comparisons. For example array_udiff_uassoc() > expects 2 callbacks are last 2 parameters one is used to compare the values > of the entries in the arrays the second to compare the keys. > Class methods are also valid callbacks. Even when the data that should be > used in the comparison is private or protected then a static method of a > class should be used (this behaviour can be seen in the regression test - > 007.phpt). -- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
