On November 13, 2003 05:54 pm, you wrote: > Again, this is breaking our naming conventions. (yeah I know there's legacy > stuff). > How about time_nanosleeop()?
Heh, I can't ever seem to get the names right. That said, I think in this case
it would be better to keep the function name as is. So, far when making a PHP
functions, which are wrappers around a C functions, the C function names were
retained. Consider existing sleep() functions, majority of string functions,
etc...
Yes, but that is concerning legacy functions when we were too dumb to do the right thing.
We agreed that although fixing backwards, we will do the right thing from now on.
Andi
-- PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
